Skip to content

Include platform in Configuration variables #4997

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: current
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

n00bundercover
Copy link

@n00bundercover n00bundercover commented Jun 15, 2025

Description:

Related issue (if applicable): fixes

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable):

  • esphome/esphome#

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /components/index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The documentation for the ESPHome OTA component was updated to introduce a new required configuration variable called "platform." This addition appears in the configuration variables section, clarifying that users must now specify the platform used to initiate OTA.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
components/ota/esphome.rst Added documentation for a new required "platform" configuration variable in the ESPHome OTA component section.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Documentation

    User->>Documentation: Reads OTA component config
    Documentation-->>User: Presents required "platform" variable and its description
    User->>Documentation: Reviews other optional variables
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jesserockz

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35f0249 and 2d04319.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/ota/esphome.rst (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/ota/esphome.rst

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/ota/esphome.rst (1)

30-30: Clarify valid platform values
Consider listing the supported platform identifiers (e.g., esphome, http_request) so users know which values are accepted here.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a103f13 and 35f0249.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/ota/esphome.rst (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**`: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

**: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

  • components/ota/esphome.rst
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2d04319
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/esphome/deploys/684ed2512d044d000878da42
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4997--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Member

@jesserockz jesserockz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do not include the platform key in any other docs. If it to be added somewhere, it should go in the ota core configuration variables, not here as it is shared.

@esphome
Copy link

esphome bot commented Jun 25, 2025

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@esphome esphome bot marked this pull request as draft June 25, 2025 23:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants